Articles Posted in Articles

How Does China Conduct Antitrust Reviews of Mergers?
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

Increasingly, China’s antitrust reviews of global transactions have resulted in long investigations delaying the closing of many deals. This article outlines the Chinese merger review process and summarizes some of China’s merger decisions.Background China’s Anti-Monopoly Law (“AML”) took effect on August 1, 2008. Three agencies enforce the AML. The Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) reviews mergers…

Continue reading ›
Will the FTC Take an Enforcement Action Against a Small Transaction Consummated Years Ago?
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On October 12, 2012, the FTC voted 5-0 to approve a consent order resolving competitive concerns related to Magnesium Elektron’s acquisition of Revere Graphics.In September 2007, Magnesium Elektron acquired the assets of Revere Graphics for $15 million. Magnesium Elektron and Revere Graphics produce magnesium plates for photoengraving. The FTC was concerned the proposed merger would…

Continue reading ›
Failure To File HSR Notification Form Can Be Costly
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On September 25, 2012, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that Biglari Holdings, Inc., which owns Steak ‘n Shake and Western Sizzlin restaurant chains, agreed to pay $850,000 in civil penalties to resolve allegations that it failed to make a premerger notification filing in connection with its acquisition of 8.7% of the outstanding voting securities…

Continue reading ›
Antitrust Divisions Threatens To Block Sticky Notes Merger
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On September 4, 2012, the Antitrust Division announced that 3M Co. abandoned its plan to acquire Avery Dennison Corp.’s Office and Consumer Products Group after the Division informed 3M that it would sue to block the transaction.3M Response Later that day, 3M responded that it has only withdrawn its notification form filed under the Hart-Scott-Rodino…

Continue reading ›
FTC Challenges Consummated Transactions and Restores Competition in Cardiology Market in Reno, Nevada
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On August 6, 2012, the FTC settled a case against Renown Health, the largest provider of acute medical care in northern Nevada, related to allegations that Renown Health reduced competition in the adult cardiology market in Reno, Nevada through two allegedly anticompetitive acquisitions and the use of anticompetitive non-compete clauses.Competitive Problem Through Renown Health’s acquisitions…

Continue reading ›
FTC Withdraws Nine-Year Policy Statement on Monetary Equitable Remedies in Competition Cases
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On July 31, 2012, the Federal Trade Commission (Commission) issued a statement withdrawing the Commission’s nine-year-old Policy Statement on Monetary Equitable Remedies in Competition Cases (Policy Statement). The statement’s withdrawal was approved on a 4-1 split vote, with Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen casting the lone no vote and issuing a dissenting opinion.The 2003 Policy Statement…

Continue reading ›
Third Circuit Supports FTC On “Pay for Delay”
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On July 16th, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that pharmaceutical “pay-for-delay” settlements whereby cash is paid from a patent holding company to a generic manufacturer that agrees not to enter a market as prima facie evidence of an antitrust violation. The Third Circuit rejects the more lenient standard adopted by the other Circuit…

Continue reading ›
Seventh Circuit Sets Forth Elements for a Claim to Meet FTAIA
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On June 27th, 2012, the 7th Circuit established elements extending the reach of United States antitrust law to certain cases where foreign companies engage in anticompetitive conduct outside the United States. (Minn-Chem, Inc., et al., v. Agrium Inc., No. 10-1712, slip op. (7th Cir. June 27, 2012)).Background In Minn-Chem, indirect U.S. potash purchasers alleged price-fixing…

Continue reading ›
Aerial view of Washington DC cityscape from Arlington Virginia USA.

Contact Us

Fill out the form or call us at (202) 589-1834 to schedule your consultation.