Proud Sponsor of the Organization of Women in International Trade - Badge

Articles Posted in DOJ Antitrust Highlights

Cutting Out the Regulatory Middle-Man: AT&T Responds to DOJ’s Complaint
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On November 21, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) filed a lawsuit to block AT&T Inc.’s acquisition of Time Warner Inc. The vertical merger, which combines AT&T’s video distribution platform with Time Warner’s programming, could be the first such deal litigated in almost 40 years. According to the DOJ, the proposed acquisition will result…

Continue reading ›
DOJ Relies on Hot Docs in Block of AT&T/Time Warner Deal
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On November 20, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) filed a civil antitrust lawsuit to block AT&T Inc.’s (“AT&T”) proposed acquisition of Time Warner Inc. (“Time Warner”). The vertical merger, which combines AT&T’s video distribution platform with Time Warner’s programming, could be the first such deal litigated in almost 40 years. According to the…

Continue reading ›
Enforcement over Regulation: New Antitrust Cop Sets High Bar for Behavioral Remedies
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On November 16, 2017, Makan Delrahim, recently confirmed as Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), delivered a speech on the relationship between antitrust as law enforcement and his goal of reducing regulation. Delrahim explained that effective antitrust enforcement lessens the need for market regulations and that behavioral…

Continue reading ›
DOJ Protects U.S. Electric Arc Furnace Mill Operators
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On September 27, 2017, the DOJ announced Showa Denko K.K. (“SDK”) will be required to divest SGL Carbon SE’s (“SGL”) entire U.S. graphite electrodes business in order for SDK to proceed with its proposed $264.5 million acquisition of SGL’s global graphite electrodes business. According to the DOJ’s complaint, SDK and SGL manufacture and sell large…

Continue reading ›
Does Avoiding a Second Request Mean that Your Deal Is Approved?
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

The answer is No.  The fact that your deal avoided a second request investigation does not mean that you are in the clear if your deal substantially lessens competition in a relevant antitrust market. The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division (“DOJ”) and Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) have for years emphasized that they will investigate and…

Continue reading ›
DOJ Allows a JV of 24 Banks to Create and Operate a New Payment System
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On September 21, 2017, the DOJ’s Antitrust Division issued a business letter stating that it would not challenge a proposal by The Clearing House Payments Company LLC (“TCH”), a joint venture of 24 U.S. banks, to create and operate a new payment system that will enable the real-time transfer of funds between depository institutions, at…

Continue reading ›
DOJ Forces Divestiture to Protect Organic Milk Market
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On April 3, 2017, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced that that it forced Danone to divest its Stonyfield Farms business in order for Danone to proceed with its $12.5 billion acquisition of WhiteWave. Prior to the merger, Danone did not produce or sell organic milk in the United States, however, it produced and sold…

Continue reading ›
DOJ Settles DirecTV Lawsuit Regarding Illegal Information Sharing
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On March 23, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced that it reached a settlement that will prohibit DIRECTV Group Holdings, LLC (“DirecTV”) and its parent corporation, AT&T Inc. (“AT&T”), from illegally sharing confidential, forward-looking information with competitors. On November 2, 2016, the DOJ’s Antitrust Division filed suit alleging that DirecTV was the ringleader…

Continue reading ›
Anthem and DOJ Head to the D.C. Circuit
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

Anthem Cigna Merger Blocked February 8, 2017 On February 8, 2017, Judge Jackson blocked Anthem Inc.’s (“Anthem”) acquisition of Cigna Corp. (“Cigna”) finding that the merger would likely harm competition.  The district court wholly refuted the parties’ argument that efficiencies would be pro-consumer and a counter-weight to potential competitive problems.  U.S. District Court Judge Amy…

Continue reading ›
Duke Jumps the HSR Gun: Gets Slapped With $600,000 Penalty
Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

On January 18, 2017, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division (“Antitrust Division”) announced a $600,000 civil settlement against Duke Energy for illegal “gun-jumping” violations of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“HSR Act”). The HSR Act requires that parties to certain acquisitions notify the antitrust enforcement agencies and observe a waiting period before consummating the…

Continue reading ›
Aerial view of Washington DC cityscape from Arlington Virginia USA.

Contact Us

Fill out the form or call us at (202) 589-1834 to schedule your consultation.