On August 2, 2019, the FTC authorized an enforcement action to challenge Evonik Industries AG’s (“Evonik”) proposed $625 million acquisition of PeroxyChem Holding Company (“PeroxyChem”). Complaint The FTC is alleging the merger of the chemical companies would substantially reduce competition in the Pacific Northwest and the Southern and Central United States for the production and…
Continue reading ›Antitrust Lawyer Blog
On June 20, 2019 the Office of the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) announced an exclusion process for tariffs imposed on September 2018 (“List 3”) pursuant to the U.S. Section 301 action against China. This announcement was followed by a notice published in the Federal Register. Through this exclusion process, parties will be able to…
Continue reading ›On June 10, 2019, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division filed a complaint and reached a settlement with Canon and Toshiba for violating the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act during Canon’s acquisition of a Toshiba subsidiary. The HSR Act requires companies to notify the DOJ and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of certain mergers and…
Continue reading ›On May 30, 2019 President Trump announced via Twitter that the United States (U.S.) will impose tariffs on Mexican imports to prompt Mexico to significantly reduce immigration to the U.S. President Trump will impose these additional tariffs in the context of rapidly increasing immigration from Mexico to the U.S. over the past months. In declaring…
Continue reading ›President Trump announced an agreement to remove the tariffs imposed on steel and aluminum imports from Canada and Mexico as part of the renegotiated North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”). The current tariffs included a 25 percent rate on steel imports and 10 percent on aluminum imports. In response to the United States’ steel and…
Continue reading ›Last week, the Trump Administration raised tariffs to 25% on $200 billion worth of goods that previously were subject to 10% tariffs. The increased rate in tariffs were brought on as a result of accusations that the Chinese delegation to the trade negotiations back-tracked on previous agreements, and the increase was meant to ratchet up…
Continue reading ›The last few weeks brought a flurry of developments regarding international trade. Two petitions recently were filed with the US International Trade Commission (“ITC”). On April 30th, Hirsh Industries filed an antidumping (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) petition on imports of certain vertical metal file cabinets from China. The petition covers metal filing cabinets containing…
Continue reading ›When USTR announced tariffs on imports from China on July 6, 2018, it also announced the procedures and deadlines for seeking exclusions from such duties. Late last month, USTR announced that it would grant exclusions from tariffs for a second set of Chinese imports (“List 2”). The second round of exclusions cover about 87 separate…
Continue reading ›A lawsuit commenced by the American Institute for International Steel (“AIIS”) regarding the constitutionality of Section 232 before the Court of International Trade (“CIT”) has been decided. A three-judge panel decided that Section 232 was not unconstitutional. The plaintiffs argued that Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended, did not properly…
Continue reading ›In February 2019, the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division required divestitures from Thales in order for the company to proceed with its proposed $5.64 billion acquisition of Gemalto. Why This Merger Mattered Prior to the transaction, Thales and Gemalto were the world’s leading providers of General Purpose Hardware Security Modules (GP HSMs). These devices are…
Continue reading ›





